Following a series of tragic car accidents in Korea, there is a growing debate about the use of pedal cameras as a potential solution to address sudden unintended acceleration (SUA) incidents. These cameras, which are being suggested as a means to capture drivers' foot movements, have sparked discussions about whether they should be mandated as standard equipment by car manufacturers or left as an optional choice for individual drivers. Proponents argue that pedal cameras could provide crucial evidence in post-accident investigations, while critics express concerns about the financial burden on drivers and the lack of preventive measures. The recent accidents, including a fatal crash near Seoul City Hall, have intensified the discussion on SUA. While some drivers have attributed accidents to uncontrollable acceleration, skepticism about these claims is widespread. The Korea Transportation Safety Authority has reported that a significant number of accidents blamed on SUA were later found to be caused by driver error, such as mistakenly pressing the wrong pedal. The proposed use of pedal cameras has led to conflicting views, with some advocating for their mandatory installation by car manufacturers and others emphasizing the importance of preventive measures similar to Japan's unintended acceleration prevention system. Additionally, the widespread use of dash cams in Korea has added to the debate over the additional costs and practicality of introducing pedal cameras. In summary, the discussions surrounding the use of pedal cameras in response to SUA incidents in Korea involve considerations of mandatory installation by car manufacturers, the financial impact on drivers, and the effectiveness of preventive measures. The contrasting views highlight the complexity of addressing SUA and the need for a comprehensive approach to enhance road safety.